Mapping and prioritising landscape feature restoration in agricultural landscapes: A case study in Brandenburg, Germany
Authors: Linn N. Schaan, Elizabeth A. Finch, Ariani C. Wartenberg, Vincent S. Boettner, Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura, Aletta Bonn, Guy Pe’er
First published in: Land Use Policy, Vol 154, July 2025, 107531
Read full paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107531
Highlights
- A spatially-explicit approach to evaluate and prioritise LF restoration.
- Clustering landscape characteristics help identify priority areas for LF restoration.
- 94.4% of Brandenburg's landscapes fall short of the 10% landscape feature target.
- Focusing on low-production areas at local scale can help reach the 10 % target.
- Farmers’ acceptance and landscape characteristics are vital for successful adoption.
Abstract
EU agricultural landscapes are vital for biodiversity. Intensive agricultural practices constitute, however, key drivers of biodiversity loss.
The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 aims to restore “at least 10% of agricultural area under high-diversity landscape features”, yet it lacks specific guidance for assessment and implementation.
Here, we develop an approach to
- map and assess agricultural landscape features (LF) cover at a landscape scale,
- cluster agricultural landscapes by complexity using both compositional and configurational heterogeneity metrics, and
- prioritise landscapes and sites for LF restoration by targeting areas of lower productivity and higher erosion risk, to enhance farmer acceptance and increase restoration benefits.
Using Brandenburg, Germany, as a case study, we found that 94.4% of landscapes fall short of the 10% landscape features cover target. We categorised five agricultural landscape types ranging from simple to complex mosaics. At the local scale, in ten randomly selected landscapes, we identified an additional 11% of agricultural areas on which LF could be restored.
Our study helps advance methodologies to prioritise LF restoration. It can provide guidance for administrators and planners to assess the LF status and advance their adoption by farmers. We recommend prioritising landscapes and selecting restoration actions based on overall landscape complexity assessment.
At the local scale, we recommend participatory processes involving local stakeholders.
We believe our methodology is transferable to other EU regions, and highlights both the opportunities and challenges in developing a standardised, EU-wide approach for prioritising LF restoration to support agroecological transitions in Europe.
Find out more:
Read full paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107531